Ordo 2020

frjps; 1: As for the redesign being inadequate, the Ordo app is a work in progress and we are doing the best we can with a one-member department. 2: It was with the 2018 version of the app that Paulist Press was forced to make a decision to suspend the 29 separate versions of the app in favor of the General Edition. An explanation for the change has been available on the Ordo FAQ page on the Paulist Press website since the change was first implemented, two years ago. The FAQ page is suggested in the App Store as a place to make inquiries and suggestions, all of which are responded to. Posting a negative review for a change that has been in place for the previous two versions and been adequately explained is not only unfair, but impedes our mission—one we all should be sharing—and stands to discourage those who might find the General Edition useful. We would rather the app not be purchased than to have it purchased, then denigrated, by a user who is aware of the app’s format prior to purchasing. We are looking forward to a time in the future when we will be better able to produce the 29 separate regional databases, as success of the current format allows. In the meantime, Paulist Press is requesting the removal of this review and rating.

It was with the 2018 version of the app that Paulist Press was forced to make a decision to suspend the 29 separate versions of the app in favor of the General Edition. An explanation for the change has been available on the Ordo FAQ page on the Paulist Press website since the change was first implemented, two years ago. The FAQ page is suggested in the App Store as a place to make inquiries and suggestions, all of which are responded to. Posting a negative review for a change that has been in place for the previous two versions and been adequately explained is not only unfair, but impedes our mission—one we all should be sharing—and stands to discourage those who might find the General Edition useful. We would rather the app not be purchased than to have it purchased, then denigrated, by a user who is aware of the app’s format prior to purchasing. We are looking forward to a time in the future when we will be better able to produce the 29 separate regional databases, as success of the current format allows. In the meantime, Paulist Press is requesting the removal of this review and rating.